Sunday, March 26, 2006

Which Comes First? The Chicken or the Egg?

by Sister Jian Chittister, OSB

I've never been too good at the old "chicken and egg" question. Which one of them came first didn't interest me much. I mean, who cares?

But I'm beginning to see the value of the problem. Somewhere along the line, if we're really intent on something, we begin to see that the issue can actually be paramount. For example: Ever since International Woman's Day on March 8, there's been a plethora of articles on women who would ordinarily otherwise be invisible.

I know you were expecting me to write a column for the occasion, too. However, since every day of the year is International Woman's Day to me, I decided to wait till no one else was writing anything much at all on the subject and catch you by surprise. So what am I doing here so soon, you ask?

Well, like everyone else in the world, I suppose, I picked up some interesting information from that little flicker of attention to women and their place in the affairs of humankind. This year, I noticed, even men were writing some of the articles calling for the inclusion of women in public affairs. That, I thought, was promising. Maybe we're really approaching the point where the question of "women" is no longer a "woman's question" but more what it is in truth: a human question that affects everything and everyone on earth.

Then I read some of the articles. Some things looked very good. At least on the surface. Some things, on the other hand, did not. Women candidates have won the equivalent of presidential elections in Germany, Chile and Liberia -- hardly places where Las Vegas would have expected such a thing to happen.

In 100 other countries, the number of women in parliaments has increased. In Nordic countries, 40 percent of the seats go to women; in Rwanda, women now hold 48 percent of the seats in parliament. But the average percentage of women in representative bodies worldwide, according to the Inter-Parliamentary Union, is still only 15-16 percent of the total, including in the United States. In Arab states, 8 percent of the representatives are women.

Despite U.N. studies indicating that where women are better represented, governments are less corrupt and more attuned to social issues, most countries have yet to reserve at least 30 percent of their seats in parliament for women as the U.N. sponsored bodies have recommended.

Obviously, a universal commitment to the advancement of women and their place in the public sphere is seriously lacking, whatever the pathetically small number of women who, by some fluke of the political environment, are exceptions to the rule.

The United States, for instance, is embarrassingly absent from among the 182 signatory governments to the U.N. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, a bill of rights for women.

Women have also gained a footing in the corporate and commercial world. But only barely. In fact, in many cases, the very numbers of working women serve to mask the dirty underside of the "feminization of poverty."

As a result, where men who can't get jobs are likely to be poor, women are likely to be poor even when they get them. British economists estimate that at the present rate of parity, it will be 200 years before women earn the same amount as men.

Educationally, women have made strides, as well. There are now 1.33 women graduating from college in the United States for every man. But even with a college degree, they're getting paid less than the men are. In Iran where the literacy rate is 98 percent, 65 percent of all university entrants are women but they remain beholden to the patriarchal system that governs the country.

Clearly, the stereotypes about women remain. Despite all the so-called advancements women have made everywhere around the world, the assumptions linger that they are really not "natural" leaders, that they're not as bright as men, that women who raised children, nursed them through the nights, supported them alone, carried three year olds on one hip and a bag of groceries on the other at the same time, can't do "heavy work," can't be both politicians and "good" mothers while the men they marry are nevertheless honored as politicians and "good" fathers.

Everywhere extremist governments and fundamentalist religious groups have limited the opportunities, silenced the voices and defined the role of women to the advantage of men. (See " Perspectives: Women in the Lead," at the Web site us.oneworld.net)

The educational levels, occupations and public participation of women do not seem to be making the kinds of differences that matter.

In Ireland this week, that bastion of Roman Catholic morality, three court cases were reported in the daily papers that make the ongoing position of women all too plain.

One man got eight years in jail for the random rape and manslaughter of a young woman.

A second man, convicted of molesting his three teenage daughters for 11 years, was sentenced to five years in jail, one year of which was suspended.

In the third case, a grandfather and three of his sons beat a fourth son's ex-partner with "a hammer, a hurly and batons." Of this situation the judge declared it was a "sad, sad, sad tale to happen in modern Ireland where five men, led by the grandfather of the woman's children, descend on a house in the middle of the night and assault a woman." Then the judge sentenced the grandfather to a four year suspended sentence since the man intended to move from the area. His sons received three, two and one-year sentences, all of which were suspended.

From where I stand, I have to wonder how "sad" anybody really thinks it is when men kill, rape or beat a woman if eight years is the value they put on a woman's life, if incest merits a slap on the wrist, if a woman can be beaten bloody by four men armed with clubs and pay no price for it whatsoever-- even now, even here.

So what must come first when we say what we want is real change: a change in the laws or a change in attitudes. The chicken or the egg?

Maybe we better all take that question more seriously now.

"The spirit we have, not the work we do, is what makes us important to the people around us."


Saturday, March 25, 2006

Deaths in Reeve family shook us to the core

By Jerry Large, Seattle Times staff columnist

I hadn't given much thought to Dana Reeve until she died, but I felt something when I read about her.

It wasn't grief that kept the thought of her death in my mind long after I'd put the paper down. It was a deep sense of unfairness. Her death was an assault on some innate need for fairness. As unfair as we can all be in our behavior toward one another, we still have a need to believe the world is not composed of random happenings.

Gordon Parks died this week, too. I knew more about him and respected his work, but he was 93 years old, so I didn't think he'd been shortchanged.

Reeve was 44, but it was more than her age that bothered me.

Reeve, as you know, was married to Christopher Reeve, the actor who became famous portraying Superman in several movies. He was paralyzed in a fall from a horse, and for several years Dana cared for him and joined with him in trying to improve the lot of other people who were paralyzed.

That would have been enough to elicit my sympathy. Here was a young couple whose lives were thrown by a chance event no one would have chosen. And their response was to make something good from it.

Then it got worse. Right after he died, she was diagnosed with lung cancer. Oh, and she didn't smoke.

I thought about the story of Job. Is there a lesson in here that transcends her pain and makes it all worthwhile? Sure, somewhere, and maybe someone out there will see that his life isn't so bad, but that'll last about two minutes.

Then it got worse. She died and left behind a 13-year-old son. Thirteen is a painful, confused, scary time of life. Transcendent lesson? The word that occurred to me can't be reproduced here.

My feelings, of course, weren't really about Dana Reeve, or her son. They were about my need to believe against all the evidence to the contrary that life is fair.

People put a lot of effort into imposing fairness on the world.

We have rules and regulations to enforce it, and when we can't make it happen, we invent visions of it.

I remember being a kid and learning for the first time that babies in Africa were starving to death every day. I wanted to know how God could allow that. How could we allow it?

People have lots of answers to those questions, but they all seem to be inventions to make it seem not so unfair, often by placing blame on whoever is suffering; in the case of those babies, on their parents, or their leaders, anything to make it understandable.

We need to believe in fairness because we want the world to make sense, and because we want security for ourselves. There is no security in a world where chance rules.

So we constantly examine things for their fairness.

When someone wins the Lotto, doesn't some part of your brain automatically rate their worthiness?

No one wants good things to happen to bad people or bad things to happen to good people. Hey, we're good people, so good things should happen to us. That's the way the world ought to work.

You saw that study reported a few weeks ago, in which people played a game with some volunteers, some of whom were honest and some obvious cheaters. The subjects were then hooked up to brain-scanning machinery while they watched other players receive a shock to the hand.

When an innocent player got a shock, people's brains registered activity in pain-related areas. We don't like seeing innocents suffer.

Women's brains empathized even with cheaters. But when the cheaters got a shock, men showed no empathy, and in fact got a little pleasure from the punishment.

He had it coming to him, is a classic guy line. Life, however, isn't so neat.

The Reeves recognized that life isn't fair, but they worked to make it better, which is about all any of us can do.

[Jerry Large: 206-464-3346 or jlarge@seattletimes.com -- His column runs Thursdays and Sundays and is found at www.seattletimes.com/jerrylarge.]

Copyright (c) 2006 The Seattle Times Company

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

What Don't Fit Don't Force ...

Thanks to David Enroth ('Sky'):


Jerri Bottomly and Sally Santana are two friends who nurture my spirituality with their wisdom. Watergate's famous Leon Jaworski has a son Joseph who wrote a book with Peter Senge called Synchronicity: The Inner Path of Leadership. Sally Santana writes religion columns for the Bremerton Sun, and her column this week reminded me of the wisdom I had found some years ago in Joseph Jaworski's book...

Recently I was told a story about a person's frantic search for artichokes. He couldn't find any at the local grocery store and became enraged. Confrontations took place with the produce manager, the cashier, and store manager, all to no avail. This store simply didn't have enough demand for artichokes. Rather than let go and find artichokes down the street at a specialty store, the person used every manipulative trick there was to force an answer. Doesn't work, does it?

Relationships between human beings are very complex because there are not two people exactly the same. Given time, every relationship will disappoint us no matter how much love is there. We become wise when we can see the other struggling to meet their own needs rather than judging them by the disappointment we feel when they don't meet ours.

When I give myself more freedom ... I am often surprised by the coincidences, good luck, serendipities, and synchronicities that flow through my life. May it be so for all ... Sky

"When we let go and let God all manner of possibilities are given spiritual presence. In order words, what don't fit don't force be it in relationships or other forms of problem solving."

________________________________

Coincidences: Luck or Do They Have Purposes?

By Sally Santana | On Religion

March 18, 2006

Don't you just love a good coincidence? Some call it luck, or serendipity. Other's call it synchronicity. Whatever it is, it's when the "stars align" and things happen in such a way that you know it couldn't just be an accident of timing.

An example could be that, in October, you decided to embark on a fitness program. Not after New Year's, when its a popular thing to do, or in spring, to fit into those Speedo's for summer. No, you choose October. You made a few false starts getting started, and you're wondering if maybe you could talk a friend into walking with you after work for a half hour or so to increase your chances of sticking with it.

The phone rings. It's a friend of your mother's that lives a block away, wondering if you'd be interested in talking a short walk with her after dinner a couple nights a week. She's just been diagnosed with diabetes, and needs to increase her exercise.

Things like this happen all the time, probably millions of times a day. Could there possibly be any reason events like this happen? If there were, they would cease to be "luck" and have purpose behind them. Hmmm.....

C. G. Jung is often referred to as the father of synchronicity, which he defines as "meaningful coincidences."

Author David Spangler asserts that intuition and synchronicity are similar. He writes, "Likewise, synchronicity is precipitated intuition: we know of a connection not inwardly but outwardly, through action and perception. In both cases, the pattern carries the same message: we live in a world more intricately and holistically organized than we may ever have previously supposed."

Inspiration lives here, too.

My son is arguably the greatest fan of all James Redfield's books, especially "The Celestine Prophecy". These works focus on the function of not only synchronicity, but the power of intention and personal responsibility.

At the Redfield Web site, www.celestinevision.com, there is a list of insights that make up the prophecy. In the sixth, it speaks of clearing our past, which can hold us up from accomplishing our spiritual missions now. This spoke to me in my life today. In reading this, I was reminded of the saying that we are not carbon based life forms having a spiritual experience, but co-creators with the Creator, having opportunities to further the goals of peace, tolerance, forgiveness, and love.

James and Salle Redfield will be in Bremerton on April 4, at West Sound Unity. The new movie, "The Celestine Prophecy", plays there the end of the week. Details are on their Web site at www.westsoundunity.org.

You know that there is something greater in you. God, however you understand it, is the source of light and sound, inspiration and stars, all that is seen and unseen. We know that, just because we can't behold something with our physical senses, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Listen for and honor synchronicity and inspiration and make the world a better place to live.

Copyright 2006, kitsapsun.com. All Rights Reserved.



ENVY'S END

By Jerri Bottomly

One of the most incontrovertible qualities of American life is the fact of competition. We begin by competing with daddy for mother's love, and then later compete with mother for daddy's love. When brothers and sisters arrive, we develop a fierce competition in our efforts to become our parents' favorite. It is no surprise that these relationships often develop a love/hate character that later carries us into our growing up world with sometimes unpleasant consequences.

For inherent in these competitive struggles the green-eyed monsters of envy and jealousy emerge to wreak havoc with our emotions, sometime producing strong feelings of ambivalence. For who of us can say that we have never harbored feelings of competitiveness and envy in our closest relationships?

All the way through school I was envious of my closest friends. They were prettier than I, brighter than I, had more boy friends. I was fiercely competitive , but the things I won were not the things I really wanted. I was always wishing I could be better than one or the other at something! My very best friend was very attractive and had grown into a woman's body, while I was still in my training bra. She was elected to be class president, while I ran for all-school secretary and lost by ten votes. Still I loved this friend dearly, even though I had the love/hate feelings that made me feel guilty, along with my jealousy, of her popularity. When her picture appeared in the North High paper, as the "glamour girl of the month," I was happy for her and angry at her at the same time. That "honor" was no little thing at North, and I had always coveted it for myself.

Interestingly enough, I was surprised to learn later that my friend had harbored feelings of envy toward me because I enjoyed writing and drama and was chosen to be a graduation speaker. These mixed feelings we felt toward each other in high school have resolved themselves through the years, and our friendship is stronger than ever. After all, rivalries are weaker in old age, if they are there at all, and now I am my friend's greatest cheer leader, as she is mine. There are blessings in "envy's end."

Henry Drummond, a 19th century theologian, in his beautiful little book, "The Greatest Thing in the World," about I Corinthians 13, described the characteristics of love. Using the old-style English, with all its rich floridity and elegance, he speaks of two of those qualities as he declares: Love envieth not," and "Love seeketh not her own." Later, Drummond arrives at a rather startling conclusion when he tells us that a person who loves will neither envy nor "covet what is his neighbours" because……" He would rather they possessed it than himself." …!!!

How the world would be blessed if each of us could achieve such unselfishness and generosity! True, this is a high standard against which to measure ourselves; but blessings often arrive through our struggles toward perfection. And relationships can thrive and grow more beautiful with age because love overrides and trumps the ambivalent feelings that are common to us all.

Sunday, March 12, 2006

Had a frustrating day? Imagine the frustration we inflict on God daily

By Pastor Mark Driscoll
Special to The Seattle Times

It was just an ordinary frustrating day. There was no major
catastrophe, just the steady onslaught of minor annoyances that
provided a glimpse of God's perspective.

I began my day by oversleeping and stubbing my toe because I was
rushing around. I quickly checked my e-mail to find it, yet again,
filled with ads for erectile-dysfunction pills because my Internet
filter is apparently as helpful as a napping hockey goalie.

I then took my wife's car to the dealership because it was leaking
water, only to discover that the warranty would not pay for the work
because somebody had made a clerical error. Subsequently, a joyous 10
rounds of heavyweight battle would need to be fought on the phone with
a customer-service person.

I returned to my office hoping to catch up on e-mail, but the Internet
connection was down ... again. Instead I decided to make some phone
calls, but my cellphone kept disconnecting because it works everywhere
on the planet except my home and office, of course.

In an effort to blow off some steam, I decided to take my lunch hour
and go for a drive. But some yahoo talking on a cellphone that did
work ran me off the road by drifting into my lane. This only increased
my frustration and caused me to speak in what can only be described as
the R-rated construction-worker version of tongues.

Shortly thereafter my gas light came on, signaling that I was running
out of gas, which felt like a prophetic metaphor for my life. I pulled
over to get some gas only to spill it on my pants and shoes, leaving
me both high and stinky for the remainder of the day.

By the end of the day I just wanted to sit down and watch Ultimate
Fighting on cable television because seeing someone get beat up
sounded therapeutic. But the only fight I could find was, of course, a
rerun.

So I went to bed early, hoping to get a good night's rest. But as I
lay there I began stressing out because I had not gotten very much
done that day and was now behind on many important projects. I slept a
few restless hours feeling very frustrated that my life was annoying;
that nothing works the way it is supposed to.

As a last resort, I grabbed my Bible and read Romans 8:20, which says,
"... creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but
by the will of the one who subjected it ... " To paraphrase the verse:
The world was made perfect, but God has since allowed imperfection to
enter it because we have frustrated God through our disobedience.

I laughed aloud that God would, in my moment of frustration, have me
read a verse teaching me why life on the Earth is so continually
frustrating.

According to the Bible, God made the world and all the people in the
world in a perfect state of goodness to operate together in flawless
harmony. But because of human rebellion against God, everything and
everyone in the world is now infected with imperfection, like a virus
corrupting every file on a computer. Subsequently, God spends each day
frustrated with the state of people and the world.

In the midst of life's frustrating moments, it was humbling to realize
that I am as much a part of the problems in the world as anyone, as
frustrating to God and others as anyone. My solace comes in knowing
that God does not grow weary with people like me who frustrate him and
that even in our most annoying moments, God is working hard to
straighten us out and clean up the mess we've made.

[<i>Pastor Mark Driscoll is founder of the nondenominational Mars Hill
Church in Ballard. Readers may send feedback to</i>
faithpage@seattletimes.com/.]

Copyright (c) 2006 The Seattle Times Company

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

How to Prevent a Clash of Civilizations


by Hans Kung

International Herald Tribune, March 3, 2006

Has the controversy over the Danish cartoons finally proved Samuel Huntington's theory of the "clash of civilizations" to be right? No, for civilizations are not players on the stage of world politics, nor do they wage wars; in many places, people of different cultures are living quite peacefully together.

World politics is a matter for states and their leaders, as it always has been. But they could make a mistaken theory come true through mistaken policies. A war of civilizations and religions must be prevented. The question is how.

De-escalation through dialogue. But are Muslims interested in serious dialogue?

Such a dialogue is taking place, between individuals, groups and faith communities in many places and at different levels all over the world.

As for the broad political scene, it was the former president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mohammad Khatami, who as early as 1998 proposed to the UN General Assembly that the year 2001 should be a "Year of Dialogue among Civilizations." The fearful events of Sept. 11, 2001, for which neither Iran nor Iraq were responsible, tragically confirmed the urgency of this initiative.

The General Assembly session of Nov. 8-9, 2001 was devoted to dialogue among civilizations. However, the U.S. delegate was notable for his absence from this session. The public was virtually excluded from the debate for "security reasons." The media took hardly any notice of it. So we can turn the question round: does the West want a serious dialogue with Muslims at all?

Western self-criticism is called for. But isn't it the Muslims who primarily have cause for self-criticism?

More and more Muslims today are recognizing the difficult situation of the Muslim world and are engaging in self-criticism. Since the publication of three Arab Human Development Reports in recent years, commissioned by the United Nations and the Arab League and produced by around 50 Arab academics, no one can deny that the Arab world in particular is heading for a social, political and economic crisis.

But the West shares the responsibility for this situation. It should honestly reflect on itself instead of always pointing the finger at "Islam." In many cases Western states and companies have notoriously played a part in failed developments and abuses. We in the West have every reason for a self-examination which must go below the surface of current events.

Relaxing tension by recognizing deeper-seated causes. But wasn't the indignation of Muslims over the cartoons organized, and isn't every means being used by Muslim fundamentalists to stir up popular anger?

It is true that for radical Islamist organizations and individual governments the cartoons were a welcome confirmation of their caricature of a violent and immoral West. They are like the pictures of torture from Abu Ghraib, where human rights have been deliberately violated and Muslims deliberately shamed, and can be used to exploit popular anger.

But it is also true that this popular anger could not have been exploited had the West not created such a political tinder box that it took only a spark for the frustration and fury that has built up all over the Islamic world to explode. Every day, Muslims from Morocco to Indonesia see and hear about cruel military actions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine and Chechnya.

Press freedom in a responsible press. But mustn't the freedom of opinion and press freedoms be upheld at all costs?

Without free media there can be no democracy. But freedom of expression may not be abused in such a way that it deliberately violates central religious feelings and produces stereotypical hostile images - formerly of Jews, now of Muslims. Press freedom entails being responsible.

If it is not permissible to defame individuals and to violate their dignity, then one should also deal tactfully in the media with the great religious figures of humankind, whether it be the Prophet Muhammad, the Buddha or Jesus Christ.

A solution to the Palestine problem: central to easing the tension. But mustn't Hamas first recognize the right of Israel to exist, renounce all violence and subscribe to international agreements arrived at so far?

The Palestinians can likewise demand that first Israel must withdraw from all occupied territories in accordance with UN resolution 242, refrain from attacks by the Israeli army and comply with all the UN resolutions which it has ignored.

However, that will not get us very far. More than 50 years of what in practice has been a partisan policy of "mediation" by the United States in favor of Israel has made the Palestinians, whose situation has constantly deteriorated, doubt whether the U.S. really is an honest broker for peace.

The Middle East conflict is not at root a terrorist problem but a territorial conflict. A beginning has been made with the Israeli evacuation from the Gaza Strip. Peace calls for concessions on both sides, but above all from the stronger. And today Israel, with U.S. support, is the strongest military power in the Middle East.

The vast majority of the Palestinian people voted for Hamas out of deep frustration at the corrupt and inefficient PLO regime, Israeli intransigence and American partisanship.

It is a tragic fallacy to treat the new Palestinian government as a terrorist organization and attempt to force the Palestinians back into a wretched situation by harassment and by illegally withholding the income from taxes and duties that is due them.

Strengthening Muslim forces for reform. But surely violent attacks on people by radical Islamists and the occupation of foreign embassies and cultural institutes are quite unacceptable?

Indeed such violence must be firmly resisted. Tirades by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran against Israel are to be condemned by both Muslims and non-Muslims. But the vast majority of the Iranian people voted for Ahmadinejad out of disillusionment with the previous regime of mullahs and in the hope that poverty and the lack of prospects would be overcome.

The United States fatally dismissed the reformist president, Khatami, as being the representative of an "axis of evil." So he did not have the courage at an early stage to bring the power of the overwhelming electoral vote to bear against the reactionary mullahs and their revolutionary guards. Here the U.S. played into the hands of the fundamentalist extremist Ahmadinejad.

Preventive dialogue instead of preventive war. In view of the Muhammad cartoons and the photographs of torture from Abu Ghraib, it is all the more important that we in the West should not only propagate shared values such as freedom and equality and great achievements such as democracy, human rights and tolerance, but fill them with life through an ethic of humanity, reverence for all life, solidarity, truthfulness and partnership.

On the whole the Muslims in the European Union and the United States have reacted with restraint to these painful events and have attempted to have a moderating influence on their fellow believers in Muslim countries.

I do not want the good relations between Muslims and non-Muslims to come to harm, but to become deeper, even if that has to be through shared negative experiences.

One possible way to prevent a clash of civilizations at local and regional levels would be to set up interfaith councils in as many cities as possible. Such councils have functioned well in Britain for years.

Composed of official representatives of the resident faith communities, they could tackle issues which directly affect relations between faith communities. In crisis situations they could act as mediators and prevent dangerous developments.

[The Rev. Hans Kung, a Catholic theologian, is an adviser to the United
Nations as president of the Global Ethic Foundation.
]

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Light Up Our Darkness


by Rev. Cathy Fransson

Barbara Brown Taylor, the extraordinary Episcopal preacher, remarked at a seminar in Seattle several years ago, “When I preach, I always assume there is at least one person in the congregation who is dying. And I never want to waste that person’s time.” Shocking but true. Joan Didion begins her new book, The Year of Magical Thinking in a similarly blunt way: Life changes fast. Life changes in an instant. You sit down to dinner and life as you know it ends. In a broad way, all of us live with the inescapable realities of life in the midst of death. For us to come to such a sanctuary, and I use the term with all its meanings, is to say we all need support, insight, wisdom and hope to lighten our darkness.

In our world it is not unreasonable to be depressed. But we cope. Some In this room work the political process. Others find ways to assist those without resources, homes, and food. Others of us come fresh with grief, in need of recovery, or have just received an unwelcome diagnosis. Some face surgery; some struggle with a strained relationship, a difficult person, disappointment with our own parents, our children, or grandchildren.

Since none of us can control the lives of others or many of our circumstances, all of us must come to terms with the things we cannot change, the things we might change, and the challenge of discerning which is which.

Faith has been too quick to gloss over the pain of these realities, jumping to the joyous assurance that “all things work together for good for those who love God and are called according to God’s purpose,” often pronounced in a gleeful sing song as if to say, Don’t worry about it! And lest you think I don’t believe that—and I do—let me hasten to say there is a process that precedes such deep confidence. Where do we begin?

First, as much as we deny it, we need to rid ourselves of a kind of unconscious tribal moralism: we equate good fortune with the presence of God and bad fortune with God’s absence. The first question we ask when we learn of a bad diagnosis is, what did they do wrong? We congratulate ourselves we are free of disease, for now, and worry about our own vulnerability. We think freedom from illness means we are doing something right, and everyone else must have messed up. Or God smiles on those free from misfortune and must be neglecting those who suffer. Reject this myth, my friends. It is high time we let God be God: the creator of all things, the Ground of Being who holds both the good and the bad in hand, lest we point fingers and reduce life to a tribal
moral script.

What is our alternative? Here’s an example of how to handle pain differently. When everything went south for Job, he sat down and sang out a medley of curses. He wept. He railed against his circumstances. He acknowledged the revolting developments in his life, and complained. “Why is light given to one in misery, and life to the bitter in soul, who long for death but it doesn’t come … why is light given to one who cannot see the way, whom God has fenced in? For my sighing comes like my bread and my groanings are poured out like water.” Primitive peoples did not practice the politically correct, polite euphemisms we use to gloss over our pain. As a result, like Job, they felt everything, the beauty and the terror, and kept going. We can learn from them. Although his friends moralized and offered opinions, Job encounters God and is reduced to humility and awe.

Job’s laments were like the negative psalms we like to skip over--“psalms of disorientation,” Walter Brueggemann calls them. They challenge the polite assumption that our life is nicely ordered and that’s all we ought to notice. Brueggemann thinks when we limit our choice of psalms only to celebration, we’re being disingenuous. We exclude pain in our worship, thinking we should only praise God—not complain. But Brueggemann says, “For the trusting community, [the use of Psalms of Darkness] is an act of bold faith…a transformed faith.” Psalms of lament insist “the world must be experienced as it really is and not in some pretended way….[such faith] is bold because it insists that all experiences of disorder are a proper subject for discourse with God.” Brueggemann believes “everything must be bought to speech, and everything brought to speech must be addressed to God, who is the final reference for all of life.”

The African American spirituals we heard last week are a perfect example of such lament. Singing into the pain lightened the darkness. Nobody knows the trouble I seen….I been in the storm too long. We all know what that feels like.

So Scott Peck did us a world of good by beginning his first book with the line, Life is difficult. If we grew up without that honesty, we tended to think we could control things, and bought into the myth that trouble means God’s not paying attention. To admit life is difficult is to offer all of us, friend and foe alike, the compassion we need when assaulted by unpredictable, unexpected, and unfortunate, but ordinary events. Life is not fair. And sometimes life sucks. Period.

This is the time for lament, complaint, tears, and sadness--good, healing emotions and ones we ought to express some of the time. In their book about negative emotions James and Evelyn Whitehead write, “Emotions are social strategies directed toward our interaction with other people. They attune us to the web of connections that link us to one another.” They illustrate this with the Chinese character for patience: a knife poised over the heart--meaning, we must endure a threat until we learn its mission. Feelings are signals that something is amiss. They demand we pay fierce attention until we understand what our feelings are telling us.

So if we discard the tribal myth, we must then accept the faithful life will not save us from pain. The faithful life will only offer us resources for the inevitable pain all of us face. So if we cannot glibly assume God will “fix” the pain, what can we assume, what can we learn, to allow God to be God, and to transform that pain into the abundant life?

At the Fear of Death seminar with Marcus Borg three weeks ago someone said, we live with a fear of dying; but those souls free in the cosmos live in fear of being born on the earth! There is no escaping the angst of consciousness.

I am talking about light in our darkness. Jesus is that light: Walk while you have the light, Jesus says, so that the darkness may not overtake you … believe in the light, so that you may become children of light. Light is hope, faith, the thing that lifts our cynicism, depression, and sadness and shows us a new perspective--to see ourselves from a different angle, held in the hand of God where everything that happens to us is significant and redeemable, whatever it is. Jesus does not say, darkness will not happen to us. He suggests if we walk in the light, darkness may not overtake us. If we become his followers, children of light, we will not get lost in the darkness that comes to us all.

At this year’s women’s retreat we explored how our wounds do not have to limit us; they can invite us beyond ourselves. We are all broken; we can grow strong in the broken places. There is always something more to learn, to explore, to grow up to, or to beckon us to greater consciousness. We are finite beings with an infinite potential, the capacity to see beyond our brokenness to the wholeness of all of life. John announces this theme at the very beginning of his gospel: “What has come into being in [the Word is] life, and the life [is] the light of all people. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness [does] not overcome it.”

Jesus demonstrated God’s power over death, paradoxically, through his own death. Though he died, Jesus grew in the hearts of his followers until over two thousand years later, we continue to proclaim the works of God, pointing to Jesus who accepted both the beauty and the terror of his life and whose spirit speaks with us today. Because of his example we continue to experience life-overwhelming-death in mysterious ways, even though death be unexpected, hard, or futile, as the loss of lives in Iraq seems to be.

Sharing our burdens, our fear of death and illness, is what begins healing. We may not have a solution to the problem of evil; we cannot cure all the diseases known to humankind, and we do not even cure the known diseases because we are too arrogant to share on a large enough scale. But if we bear one another’s burdens, we can begin to heal the pain we all know.

We recoil at the first sight of pain and disease. Then we struggle with it. Joan Chittester writes, “Struggle is the great crossover moment of life. It never leaves us neutral. It demands that we make a choice: either we dig down deep into the wellspring that is our innermost selves and go on beyond where we were, despite where we were, or we simply give up, stop in our tracks rooted to the spot, up to our ankles in bitterness and despair, satisfied to be less than all our personal gifts indicate that we are called to be.” When we struggle with our pain, we prevail and are changed; we change, and prevail. And “When we prevail…we are transformed. We become someone with a gift to give to others on the way.”

You remember the story. Jacob wrestles all night long, and then claims, “I have seen God face to face and I have survived.” He knew he was struggling for his life. He did not let go. He did not give up. He met the foe and struggled until he prevailed over his own weakness. Chittester asserts it is the very act of resisting despair that abolishes it. Wrestling with the pain turns change into conversion, isolation into independence, darkness into faith, and fear into
courage. Out of all these things come new strength and a new sense of self.

We must be willing to believe where we find ourselves, bad as it may seem, must be as good, somehow, as where we once wanted to be. The struggle assumes we are open to God, open to newness, wonder and surprise. She concludes hope is never a denial of reality. It is a radical affirmation of the Light of the World in our midst. In spite of the tragedy yawning before us, pain, loss, and struggle, God is with us in the trenches of our despair, strengthening us to acknowledge the darkness and keep on going. “Hope is not a matter of waiting for things outside us to get better. It is about getting better inside about what is going on outside.”

You and I know people living with cancer and its debilitating treatment, we know people with Parkinsons and MS, fybromyalgia, chronic fatigue, stroke, diabetes, and heart disease. Are you present to this? This sanctuary is a sanctuary from where others flee from such things, lest they feel their own fear. In the face of our humanness, and all the things that are outside our control, here we celebrate a paradox: the life that comes from death, the light that cannot be put out. We stand together with the least, the last and the lost to sing not only the psalms of joy, but the laments as well, in the full confidence of life in God.

“We are afflicted in every way, but not crushed; perplexed, but not driven to despair; persecuted but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed.” Paul is the first follower of Jesus who wrote honestly of his paradoxical life. He sought to kill Christians until blinded by the Light himself, and though beleaguered, imprisoned, tortured, and abused, was transformed into the first missionary of the church. In this sanctuary we have a choice: we can share one another’s lives and burdens. Or we can turn away, We can engage with others suffering from things we’d rather not know about, and learn from them. We can contribute to this community, believing in its mission within and without these walls, or give a polite pledge and walk away, thinking we have done the minimum required. We can contribute our own time and talent to the corporate struggle to make this congregation, with its rich array of leaders, a viable voice in our community, or we can come expecting others to perform for us. We can drift in and out not taking any time or courage to plumb our own darkness, or engage with strangers through whom, sometimes, the light begins to dawn.

Either we dig down deep into the wellspring within and go on beyond where we were, despite where we were, or we simply give up, stop in our tracks rooted to the spot, up to our ankles in bitterness and despair, satisfied to be less than all our personal gifts indicate that we are called to be. God’s invitation is to go beyond ourselves, to see challenge as close to God as riches are, and to struggle with the circumstances, confident in the resources God pours upon us even without our knowing.

If we aren’t going to waste everyone’s time, we need to be about God’s business, bringing peace out of pain, purpose out of struggle, and light out of darkness. If we but allow God to be God, God transforms every circumstance we face. Today is a good day to begin.

[Rev. Cathy Fransson is an associate minister at Seattle First Baptist Church in Seattle, WA. Thanks to David Enroth (SpiritWarriorSky@aol.com) for forwarding.]

Sunday, March 05, 2006

Memories of Lent


by The Rev. Canon Charles P. Gibbs, Executive Director
United Religions Initiative, San Francisco, CA


Dear Friends, Greetings of love and peace.

For many Christians around the world, this past Wednesday was Ash Wednesday, the beginning of Lent, a season of reflection, self-denial, repentance and renewal, leading up to Easter, the greatest feast day of the Christian year, celebrating the victory of life over death in Jesus' resurrection. This year I find myself wishing that our entire world would engage in serious Lenten discipline.

Lent recalls Jesus' 40 days of prayer and fasting in the wilderness at the beginning of his public ministry. During the 40 days (excluding Sundays) of Lent, Christians are asked to imitate Jesus in prayer and self-denial; to seek repentance and renewal of life.

My childhood memories of Lent are powerful. Leading up to Lent was a challenging deliberation about what to give up. Depriving myself of something I enjoyed, say sweets, was not easy, but it did help me feel closer to Jesus in his fasting, and also closer to the poor all over the world whose lives were an unending fast. I grew to enjoy the challenge of doing without something I liked.

Giving up a negative behavior could be even more difficult, but it also drew me closer to Jesus, who called all who wanted to follow him to love God fully and to love their neighbors as themselves. And I think it made me a better person.

I recall one Lent giving up fighting with my sister. We usually got along well. But, like any siblings close in age, there were times when we did things that hurt each other, sometimes intentionally. That Lent I learned how difficult it was, especially when I felt I was right and she was wrong, to step back from an escalating conflict and catch my breath.

I also learned that stepping back often created the space to resolve a conflict in a way that dissolved hard feelings rather than making them worse. That's a lesson I continue to practice.

In addition to giving something up, we also took on something extra for Lent. We went to church more frequently during the week and spent more time in private prayer or reading the Bible. We were also encouraged to take on a positive practice, such as forgiveness or patience or helping someone in need.

I also took on odd jobs. The money I made, with the money I saved from giving up sweets, went into a "mite" box, named after the tiny but powerful amount of money a poor widow gave in a story Jesus told.

On Easter everyone brought their mite boxes to church as part of the Easter offering dedicated to helping others in need. If giving up things you like to eat helped you identify with those who were hungry, making and saving money to help feed people was doing something to help alleviate the problem.

This intentional giving up and taking on made Lent seem like an especially holy time, a time to think and act more deeply in accord with God's will for a world where individuals lived righteous and upright lives; and where tribes and nations lived in peace; where the hungry were fed and the sick cared for.

Looking back, I can see what a profound impact the lessons I learned from those Lenten disciplines have had on my life. And I'm grateful in a way that fills me with joy to begin this year's Lenten journey with countless Christian brothers and sisters all over the world.

I am also grateful for and humbled and inspired by what I have learned from my Muslim brothers and sisters through their observance of Ramadan, a month of fasting, purification and alms giving; a time when they believe the gates of heaven are opened wide and Allah awaits with transforming love.

I feel the same about what I've learned from my Jewish sisters and brothers as they have journeyed faithfully - in introspection, repentance and amendment of life - through the Days of Awe - from Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, to Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement.

I'm grateful for the devotion I've seen from dear friends of diverse traditions as they dedicate themselves to rituals of self-examination, purification, self-denial and renewal of life. These practices make us better people. Holier people. And they help us make our world a better place, a kinder place, a more just and peaceful place.

So, as this Lent begins, I find myself yearning to experience the power for global transformation that might come if we, from all faiths, practiced these rituals together for a month. If, together, we repented of the madness humanity is inflicting on the sacred community of life on Earth; and, repenting, vowed together to amend our lives, eliminating negative practices and practicing virtue.

And then, together in joyous celebration, recommitted ourselves to making peace, justice and healing sovereign in this world.

What do you think?

Love, Charles

The Rev. Canon Charles P. Gibbs
Executive Director
United Religions Initiative
P.O. Box 29242
San Francisco, CA 94129
1-415-561-2300
cgibbs@uri.org

[Rev. Canon Charles P. Gibbs is the Executive Director of the United Religions Initiative, a worldwide grassroots interfaith organization whose purpose is to promote enduring, daily interfaith cooperation, to end religiously motivated violence and to create cultures of peace, justice and healing for the Earth and all living beings.]